Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Alejandro Davidovich Fokina Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Struff vs Fokina analysis and find out who is favored!
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Alejandro Davidovich Fokina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Struff 1 - 0 Fokina
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Struff has won 50.44% of points on his second serve, while Fokina has won 51.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Struff, in recent form, has won 48.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fokina has won 49.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.64% and 29.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Struff has saved 67.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fokina has saved 58.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Struff has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 24/ 21), with Fokina winning 48% (W/L 24/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Struff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 266/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 22/ 32). Fokina has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 109/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 23/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Struff has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 15/ 11), where as Fokina has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Struff winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Struff winning 2 and Fokina winning 1. The last match between Struff and Fokina was at the ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam, 13-02-2024, First, I.hard with Jan-Lennard Struff getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Struff and Fokina have played a deciding set 1 times, with Struff winning 1 times and Fokina 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Struff winning 2, and Fokina 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Struff has played against opponents with an average rank of 113.76 while Fokina has played against players with an average rank of 189.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Struff has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fokina has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Struff has converted 33.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fokina has converted 37.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Struff 1 - 0 Fokina
41
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
33
Rank
21
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (560-417)
Career Total W/L
58% (254-186)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
45% (9-11)
$4,781,615
Career Prize Money
$4,043,290
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jan-Lennard Struff | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:15 | 2:25:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (58/107) | 63% (76/120) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (49/58) | 78% (59/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (28/49) | 52% (23/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (38/120) | 28% (30/107) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
76 of
120)
16
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
59 of
76)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
28%
(
30 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
38 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jan-Lennard Struff | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (37/29) | 45% (21/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (364/332) | 49% (225/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.67 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 228 | 90 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:46 | 1:46:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 94.12 | 201.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1299/2217) | 68% (994/1467) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (987/1299) | 68% (679/994) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (463/918) | 52% (245/473) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (69/205) | 38% (47/124) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (881/2337) | 37% (554/1502) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 58% (7/5) | 29% (2/5) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 55% (6/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 44% (8/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (13/23) | 22% (2/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 17% (12/2) |
Jan-Lennard Struff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
77 of
122)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Pedro Cachin
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
83 of
131)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
69%
(
33 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
49 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Ugo Humbert
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Taylor Fritz
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
51 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(10) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Struff Vs Fokina Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
